McAfee Secured

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-300

Exam Name Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle $44.99

Pass Microsoft SC-300 with Real Questions From Testking

Download Web's Best SC-300 Exam Preparation Materials Today

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-300 Questions & Answers

    490 Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers Testing Engine software allows you to practice questions and answers in real SC-300 exam environment.

  • SC-300 Video Course

    SC-300 Video Course

    43 Video Lectures

    SC-300 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass SC-300 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-300 Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    Study Guide will give you a practical experience regarding the subject and provide an academic background. SC-300 Study Guide is available in PDF format.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    490 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-300 Video Course

    Video Course

    43 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 70

Question 690

A university is evaluating Microsoft Entra audit log exports for incident investigation readiness. The incident team needs fast interactive searches by source IP and app name. Which recommendation is most defensible?

  1. Configure authorized diagnostic delivery to a storage account with retention governance
  2. Review Privileged Identity Management audit and request history
  3. Analyze supported authentication-method registration or sign-in reporting
  4. Send sign-in logs to Log Analytics and use targeted KQL filters

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Structured sign-in fields support efficient investigation of authentication patterns.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure authorized diagnostic delivery to a storage account with retention governance would support the different situation where the records must also be preserved in a lower-cost long-term archive: an archival destination retains events for compliance without relying on interactive query retention; however it does not resolve the incident team needs fast interactive searches by source IP and app name, which calls for Send sign-in logs to Log Analytics and use targeted KQL filters.

B:

PIM approval context is distinct from the user's ordinary sign-in authentication event, which makes Review Privileged Identity Management audit and request history appropriate when the team wants to know who approved a recent PIM activation; here the task is the incident team needs fast interactive searches by source IP and app name, requiring Send sign-in logs to Log Analytics and use targeted KQL filters.

C:

When the identity team must report whether users registered stronger authentication methods this quarter, Analyze supported authentication-method registration or sign-in reporting is justified because method adoption reports measure rollout readiness and usage separately from policy configuration; here the issue is the incident team needs fast interactive searches by source IP and app name, and Send sign-in logs to Log Analytics and use targeted KQL filters addresses that distinction.

Question 691

A university is evaluating Microsoft Entra audit log exports for incident investigation readiness. The records must also be preserved in a lower-cost long-term archive. Which configuration best addresses the stated requirement?

  1. Configure authorized diagnostic delivery to a storage account with retention governance
  2. Verify diagnostic settings, workspace destination, ingestion timing and query filters
  3. Restrict Log Analytics and Entra report access using scoped read permissions
  4. Export relevant Microsoft Entra logs to a protected storage destination

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

An archival destination retains events for compliance without relying on interactive query retention.

Incorrect Answers

B:

When a KQL query returns no results even though sign-in events are visible in the Entra portal, Verify diagnostic settings, workspace destination, ingestion timing and query filters is justified because portal visibility alone does not establish that the same events have been exported into a queried workspace; here the issue is the records must also be preserved in a lower-cost long-term archive, and Configure authorized diagnostic delivery to a storage account with retention governance addresses that distinction.

C:

Restrict Log Analytics and Entra report access using scoped read permissions concerns students' sign-in data should not be visible to every classroom instructor, where log telemetry may contain sensitive identity details that require controlled access; the current scenario instead requires the records must also be preserved in a lower-cost long-term archive, so Configure authorized diagnostic delivery to a storage account with retention governance is a closer fit.

D:

The distinct mechanism for Export relevant Microsoft Entra logs to a protected storage destination is that external retention can preserve audit records beyond standard portal visibility when configured; this handles directory audit records must be retained longer than the default tenant portal period rather than the records must also be preserved in a lower-cost long-term archive, so use Configure authorized diagnostic delivery to a storage account with retention governance.

Question 692

A university is evaluating Microsoft Entra audit log exports for incident investigation readiness. Students' sign-in data should not be visible to every classroom instructor. What should the identity administrator implement?

  1. Inspect the resource-tenant sign-in event and cross-tenant Conditional Access details
  2. Use a supported Entra workbook or Log Analytics query over collected sign-in data
  3. Restrict Log Analytics and Entra report access using scoped read permissions
  4. Verify diagnostic settings, workspace destination, ingestion timing and query filters

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Log telemetry may contain sensitive identity details that require controlled access.

Incorrect Answers

A:

When guests report successful home authentication but a blocked resource-tenant sign-in, Inspect the resource-tenant sign-in event and cross-tenant Conditional Access details is justified because resource policy evaluation can deny access after the external identity has authenticated successfully; here the issue is students' sign-in data should not be visible to every classroom instructor, and Restrict Log Analytics and Entra report access using scoped read permissions addresses that distinction.

B:

Use a supported Entra workbook or Log Analytics query over collected sign-in data concerns management requests a weekly workbook showing MFA challenges and sign-in failures by application, where workbook visualizations can summarize repeated identity events when the underlying logs are available; the current scenario instead requires students' sign-in data should not be visible to every classroom instructor, so Restrict Log Analytics and Entra report access using scoped read permissions is a closer fit.

D:

Although Verify diagnostic settings, workspace destination, ingestion timing and query filters fits a KQL query returns no results even though sign-in events are visible in the Entra portal (portal visibility alone does not establish that the same events have been exported into a queried workspace), it is not the necessary control for students' sign-in data should not be visible to every classroom instructor. Select Restrict Log Analytics and Entra report access using scoped read permissions.

Question 693

A university is evaluating Microsoft Entra audit log exports for incident investigation readiness. A KQL query returns no results even though sign-in events are visible in the Entra portal. Which change most directly satisfies the scenario?

  1. Send sign-in logs to Log Analytics and use targeted KQL filters
  2. Verify diagnostic settings, workspace destination, ingestion timing and query filters
  3. Query the collected sign-ins with guest filters and distinct principal counting in KQL
  4. Configure authorized diagnostic delivery to a storage account with retention governance

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Portal visibility alone does not establish that the same events have been exported into a queried workspace.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Send sign-in logs to Log Analytics and use targeted KQL filters concerns the incident team needs fast interactive searches by source IP and app name, where structured sign-in fields support efficient investigation of authentication patterns; the current scenario instead requires a KQL query returns no results even though sign-in events are visible in the Entra portal, so Verify diagnostic settings, workspace destination, ingestion timing and query filters is a closer fit.

C:

Although Query the collected sign-ins with guest filters and distinct principal counting in KQL fits operations must count unique blocked guest identities during an outage (counting unique affected users differs from the number of failed authentication attempts), it is not the necessary control for a KQL query returns no results even though sign-in events are visible in the Entra portal. Select Verify diagnostic settings, workspace destination, ingestion timing and query filters.

D:

Configure authorized diagnostic delivery to a storage account with retention governance would support the different situation where the records must also be preserved in a lower-cost long-term archive: an archival destination retains events for compliance without relying on interactive query retention; however it does not resolve a KQL query returns no results even though sign-in events are visible in the Entra portal, which calls for Verify diagnostic settings, workspace destination, ingestion timing and query filters.

Question 694

An enterprise security center is reporting the effect of its identity governance program. The board needs to see which identity recommendations have improved over three releases. Which option is most appropriate for this specific condition?

  1. Examine workload identity sign-in or risk telemetry for the service principal
  2. Analyze provisioning log events and related application health reports over time
  3. Analyze supported password reset registration or audit records for affected users
  4. Track Identity Secure Score history and completed identity-security actions

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Secure Score can provide directional posture context across successive configuration improvements.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The distinct mechanism for Examine workload identity sign-in or risk telemetry for the service principal is that workload sign-ins lack normal human MFA context and need their own monitoring signals; this handles security operations needs evidence of a risky workload app's unusual token requests rather than the board needs to see which identity recommendations have improved over three releases, so use Track Identity Secure Score history and completed identity-security actions.

B:

Although Analyze provisioning log events and related application health reports over time fits the identity operations team needs trends in failed provisioning executions (trend monitoring helps detect systemic connector failures rather than one-off bad records), it is not the necessary control for the board needs to see which identity recommendations have improved over three releases. Select Track Identity Secure Score history and completed identity-security actions.

C:

Analyze supported password reset registration or audit records for affected users would support the different situation where a report must identify users whose SSPR attempts repeatedly fail: password recovery events can reveal account help needs independently of app access failures; however it does not resolve the board needs to see which identity recommendations have improved over three releases, which calls for Track Identity Secure Score history and completed identity-security actions.

Question 695

An enterprise security center is reporting the effect of its identity governance program. The team wants to know who approved a recent PIM activation. What configuration should be selected?

  1. Analyze supported password reset registration or audit records for affected users
  2. Track Identity Secure Score history and completed identity-security actions
  3. Route relevant log categories into a Log Analytics workspace
  4. Review Privileged Identity Management audit and request history

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

PIM approval context is distinct from the user's ordinary sign-in authentication event.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Analyze supported password reset registration or audit records for affected users fits a report must identify users whose SSPR attempts repeatedly fail (password recovery events can reveal account help needs independently of app access failures), it is not the necessary control for the team wants to know who approved a recent PIM activation. Select Review Privileged Identity Management audit and request history.

B:

Track Identity Secure Score history and completed identity-security actions would support the different situation where the board needs to see which identity recommendations have improved over three releases: secure Score can provide directional posture context across successive configuration improvements; however it does not resolve the team wants to know who approved a recent PIM activation, which calls for Review Privileged Identity Management audit and request history.

C:

Log Analytics provides a queryable store for structured identity diagnostics, which makes Route relevant log categories into a Log Analytics workspace appropriate when a compliance team wants searchable KQL investigations rather than immutable archive-only files; here the task is the team wants to know who approved a recent PIM activation, requiring Review Privileged Identity Management audit and request history.

Question 696

An enterprise security center is reporting the effect of its identity governance program. Security operations needs evidence of a risky workload app's unusual token requests. Which Microsoft Entra capability best satisfies the requirement?

  1. Examine workload identity sign-in or risk telemetry for the service principal
  2. Track Identity Secure Score history and completed identity-security actions
  3. Review Privileged Identity Management audit and request history
  4. Send selected diagnostic categories to an Azure Event Hubs destination

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Workload sign-ins lack normal human MFA context and need their own monitoring signals.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Secure Score can provide directional posture context across successive configuration improvements, which makes Track Identity Secure Score history and completed identity-security actions appropriate when the board needs to see which identity recommendations have improved over three releases; here the task is security operations needs evidence of a risky workload app's unusual token requests, requiring Examine workload identity sign-in or risk telemetry for the service principal.

C:

When the team wants to know who approved a recent PIM activation, Review Privileged Identity Management audit and request history is justified because pIM approval context is distinct from the user's ordinary sign-in authentication event; here the issue is security operations needs evidence of a risky workload app's unusual token requests, and Examine workload identity sign-in or risk telemetry for the service principal addresses that distinction.

D:

Send selected diagnostic categories to an Azure Event Hubs destination concerns security operations wants near-real-time forwarding of supported Entra log streams to a central event processor, where event Hubs supports downstream log consumers when diagnostic forwarding is configured; the current scenario instead requires security operations needs evidence of a risky workload app's unusual token requests, so Examine workload identity sign-in or risk telemetry for the service principal is a closer fit.

Question 697

An enterprise security center is reporting the effect of its identity governance program. A report must identify users whose SSPR attempts repeatedly fail. Which recommendation is most defensible?

  1. Examine workload identity sign-in or risk telemetry for the service principal
  2. Review Privileged Identity Management audit and request history
  3. Analyze supported password reset registration or audit records for affected users
  4. Use KQL aggregation with distinct principal keys and relevant event filters

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Password recovery events can reveal account help needs independently of app access failures.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Workload sign-ins lack normal human MFA context and need their own monitoring signals, which makes Examine workload identity sign-in or risk telemetry for the service principal appropriate when security operations needs evidence of a risky workload app's unusual token requests; here the task is a report must identify users whose SSPR attempts repeatedly fail, requiring Analyze supported password reset registration or audit records for affected users.

B:

When the team wants to know who approved a recent PIM activation, Review Privileged Identity Management audit and request history is justified because pIM approval context is distinct from the user's ordinary sign-in authentication event; here the issue is a report must identify users whose SSPR attempts repeatedly fail, and Analyze supported password reset registration or audit records for affected users addresses that distinction.

D:

The distinct mechanism for Use KQL aggregation with distinct principal keys and relevant event filters is that distinct principal counting is different from counting every audit operation; this handles a report displays an incorrect total because it counts the same principal across multiple role events rather than a report must identify users whose SSPR attempts repeatedly fail, so use Analyze supported password reset registration or audit records for affected users.

Question 698

A finance platform team is assessing sign-in telemetry after a Conditional Access outage. An administrator wants a report of all failed interactive Entra logins for the last six hours. What should the identity administrator implement?

  1. Route relevant log categories into a Log Analytics workspace
  2. Verify that Entra diagnostic exports deliver the selected events to the protected retention destination
  3. Query SigninLogs for the time interval and non-success result details
  4. Join the sign-in policy evaluation with the relevant directory audit change records

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Time-scoped sign-in searches narrow investigation to the outage window.

Incorrect Answers

A:

When a compliance team wants searchable KQL investigations rather than immutable archive-only files, Route relevant log categories into a Log Analytics workspace is justified because log Analytics provides a queryable store for structured identity diagnostics; here the issue is an administrator wants a report of all failed interactive Entra logins for the last six hours, and Query SigninLogs for the time interval and non-success result details addresses that distinction.

B:

Verify that Entra diagnostic exports deliver the selected events to the protected retention destination concerns the company needs an independently retained copy of the outage logs for external audit, where portal retention cannot be relied on alone for long-term regulatory event preservation; the current scenario instead requires an administrator wants a report of all failed interactive Entra logins for the last six hours, so Query SigninLogs for the time interval and non-success result details is a closer fit.

D:

Although Join the sign-in policy evaluation with the relevant directory audit change records fits the team must correlate the failure spike to a newly changed Conditional Access rule (a runtime access failure and the configuration change causing it must be linked with evidence), it is not the necessary control for an administrator wants a report of all failed interactive Entra logins for the last six hours. Select Query SigninLogs for the time interval and non-success result details.

Question 699

A finance platform team is assessing sign-in telemetry after a Conditional Access outage. The team must correlate the failure spike to a newly changed Conditional Access rule. Which change most directly satisfies the scenario?

  1. Validate device and Conditional Access metrics separately from authentication failure counts
  2. Query SigninLogs for the time interval and non-success result details
  3. Verify that Entra diagnostic exports deliver the selected events to the protected retention destination
  4. Join the sign-in policy evaluation with the relevant directory audit change records

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A runtime access failure and the configuration change causing it must be linked with evidence.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Validate device and Conditional Access metrics separately from authentication failure counts concerns a dashboard claims that declining failures means every device is compliant, where fewer sign-in errors do not prove device management compliance or policy coverage; the current scenario instead requires the team must correlate the failure spike to a newly changed Conditional Access rule, so Join the sign-in policy evaluation with the relevant directory audit change records is a closer fit.

B:

The distinct mechanism for Query SigninLogs for the time interval and non-success result details is that time-scoped sign-in searches narrow investigation to the outage window; this handles an administrator wants a report of all failed interactive Entra logins for the last six hours rather than the team must correlate the failure spike to a newly changed Conditional Access rule, so use Join the sign-in policy evaluation with the relevant directory audit change records.

C:

Although Verify that Entra diagnostic exports deliver the selected events to the protected retention destination fits the company needs an independently retained copy of the outage logs for external audit (portal retention cannot be relied on alone for long-term regulatory event preservation), it is not the necessary control for the team must correlate the failure spike to a newly changed Conditional Access rule. Select Join the sign-in policy evaluation with the relevant directory audit change records.

Question 700

A finance platform team is assessing sign-in telemetry after a Conditional Access outage. The company needs an independently retained copy of the outage logs for external audit. What is the best next administrative action?

  1. Join the sign-in policy evaluation with the relevant directory audit change records
  2. Query SigninLogs for the time interval and non-success result details
  3. Review app-related Entra audit logs and permission grant records
  4. Verify that Entra diagnostic exports deliver the selected events to the protected retention destination

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Portal retention cannot be relied on alone for long-term regulatory event preservation.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The distinct mechanism for Join the sign-in policy evaluation with the relevant directory audit change records is that a runtime access failure and the configuration change causing it must be linked with evidence; this handles the team must correlate the failure spike to a newly changed Conditional Access rule rather than the company needs an independently retained copy of the outage logs for external audit, so use Verify that Entra diagnostic exports deliver the selected events to the protected retention destination.

B:

Although Query SigninLogs for the time interval and non-success result details fits an administrator wants a report of all failed interactive Entra logins for the last six hours (time-scoped sign-in searches narrow investigation to the outage window), it is not the necessary control for the company needs an independently retained copy of the outage logs for external audit. Select Verify that Entra diagnostic exports deliver the selected events to the protected retention destination.

C:

Review app-related Entra audit logs and permission grant records would support the different situation where the audit committee requires evidence of app consent grants made by administrators: consent changes can create access without an associated failed user sign-in; however it does not resolve the company needs an independently retained copy of the outage logs for external audit, which calls for Verify that Entra diagnostic exports deliver the selected events to the protected retention destination.