McAfee Secured

Microsoft SC-200 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-200

Exam Name Microsoft Security Operations Analyst

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Security Operations Analyst Associate

Microsoft SC-200 Bundle $44.99

Pass Microsoft SC-200 with Real Questions From Testking

Download Web's Best SC-200 Exam Preparation Materials Today

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-200 Questions & Answers

    499 Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers Testing Engine software allows you to practice questions and answers in real SC-200 exam environment.

  • SC-200 Video Course

    SC-200 Video Course

    47 Video Lectures

    SC-200 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass SC-200 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Security Operations Analyst exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-200 Study Guide

    441 PDF Pages

    Study Guide will give you a practical experience regarding the subject and provide an academic background. SC-200 Study Guide is available in PDF format.

Microsoft Security Operations Analyst (SC-200) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    499 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-200 Video Course

    Video Course

    47 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    441 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-200 Practice Test 42

Question 410

The utility operator SOC needs to suspend access by a high-risk OAuth application after confirming malicious activity, and its change advisory board asks for the technical basis of the recommended method. Which explanation identifies the most relevant capability?

  1. Remediation depends on the specific protected workload and observed issue.
  2. Cloud app telemetry can reveal anomalous SaaS download behavior.
  3. Cloud app activity analytics provides SaaS session context.
  4. OAuth app controls can revoke or restrict malicious access without deleting unrelated data.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

OAuth app controls can revoke or restrict malicious access without deleting unrelated data.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Prioritizing the remediation of a supported container or database resource alert does not suspend access by a high-risk OAuth application after confirming malicious activity.

B:

Detecting unusual mass downloads from a connected SaaS service does not suspend access by a high-risk OAuth application after confirming malicious activity.

C:

Investigating impossible travel or suspicious cloud app sessions does not suspend access by a high-risk OAuth application after confirming malicious activity.

Question 411

An OAuth app was confirmed malicious but can still obtain user tokens because the team disabled a single user without removing the app's tenant-wide permission. Which explanation best accounts for the specific failure?

  1. The app's authorized grants and access were not revoked through the supported cloud app governance response
  2. OAuth app permissions and consent must be assessed in cloud app/Entra governance evidence, not in endpoint file events
  3. The evidence is cloud-session/download activity, not necessarily local malware execution
  4. Resource alert context was not correlated with the Azure Activity and access records relevant to the VM

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The app's authorized grants and access were not revoked through the supported cloud app governance response.

Incorrect Answers

B:

OAuth app permissions and consent must be assessed in cloud app/Entra governance evidence, not in endpoint file events; the app's authorized grants and access were not revoked through the supported cloud app governance response.

C:

The evidence is cloud-session/download activity, not necessarily local malware execution; the app's authorized grants and access were not revoked through the supported cloud app governance response.

D:

Resource alert context was not correlated with the Azure Activity and access records relevant to the VM; the app's authorized grants and access were not revoked through the supported cloud app governance response.

Question 412

During a controlled investigation, a malicious third-party app's consent and access are revoked after incident approval. Which observation most directly verifies the intended technical behavior?

  1. The app record shows its consented scopes, granting principal and related cloud activity
  2. Defender for Cloud Apps activity records show user, app, file actions, session and download counts
  3. The matched VM resource ID, activity operation, caller and timestamp establish the permission-change chain
  4. The governance action logs show grant removal or app restriction and subsequent attempted access is denied

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The governance action logs show grant removal or app restriction and subsequent attempted access is denied.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The app record shows its consented scopes, granting principal and related cloud activity; the governance action logs show grant removal or app restriction and subsequent attempted access is denied.

B:

Defender for Cloud Apps activity records show user, app, file actions, session and download counts; the governance action logs show grant removal or app restriction and subsequent attempted access is denied.

C:

The matched VM resource ID, activity operation, caller and timestamp establish the permission-change chain; the governance action logs show grant removal or app restriction and subsequent attempted access is denied.

Question 413

A software firm needs to detect unusual mass downloads from a connected SaaS service. Its current security configuration cannot meet this specific operational requirement. Which action should the SOC implement?

  1. Use appropriate Defender for Cloud Apps anomaly or activity evidence for the cloud session
  2. Inspect the incident's recorded disruption response and affected identity
  3. Take an authorized cloud app governance remediation action for the app
  4. Inspect the app's permissions, consent events and affected users in cloud app governance

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Cloud app telemetry can reveal anomalous SaaS download behavior.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Disruption evidence identifies containment actions distinct from routine policy blocks.

C:

OAuth app controls can revoke or restrict malicious access without deleting unrelated data.

D:

OAuth investigations focus on delegated app privileges and grants rather than device malware alone.

Question 414

The legal practice SOC needs to detect unusual mass downloads from a connected SaaS service, and its change advisory board asks for the technical basis of the recommended method. Which explanation identifies the most relevant capability?

  1. Cloud app telemetry can reveal anomalous SaaS download behavior.
  2. OAuth investigations focus on delegated app privileges and grants rather than device malware alone.
  3. Ownership and status capture investigation responsibility.
  4. OAuth app controls can revoke or restrict malicious access without deleting unrelated data.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Cloud app telemetry can reveal anomalous SaaS download behavior.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Investigating a user that granted unusual consent to a third-party OAuth app does not detect unusual mass downloads from a connected SaaS service.

C:

Routing a newly triaged high-severity incident to the appropriate SOC team does not detect unusual mass downloads from a connected SaaS service.

D:

Suspending access by a high-risk OAuth application after confirming malicious activity does not detect unusual mass downloads from a connected SaaS service.

Question 415

A cloud-app alert detects large downloads for a user but the analyst assumes the alert is an endpoint binary-execution event. Which explanation best accounts for the specific failure?

  1. OAuth app permissions and consent must be assessed in cloud app/Entra governance evidence, not in endpoint file events
  2. The evidence is cloud-session/download activity, not necessarily local malware execution
  3. The app's authorized grants and access were not revoked through the supported cloud app governance response
  4. Remediation steps were selected for the wrong workload type and not verified against affected-resource evidence

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The evidence is cloud-session/download activity, not necessarily local malware execution.

Incorrect Answers

A:

OAuth app permissions and consent must be assessed in cloud app/Entra governance evidence, not in endpoint file events; the evidence is cloud-session/download activity, not necessarily local malware execution.

C:

The app's authorized grants and access were not revoked through the supported cloud app governance response; the evidence is cloud-session/download activity, not necessarily local malware execution.

D:

Remediation steps were selected for the wrong workload type and not verified against affected-resource evidence; the evidence is cloud-session/download activity, not necessarily local malware execution.

Question 416

During a controlled investigation, a connected SaaS account performs a controlled abnormal batch file download. Which observation most directly verifies the intended technical behavior?

  1. The app record shows its consented scopes, granting principal and related cloud activity
  2. The governance action logs show grant removal or app restriction and subsequent attempted access is denied
  3. Its threat details and supported database-specific recommendation align with the affected resource and response action
  4. Defender for Cloud Apps activity records show user, app, file actions, session and download counts

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Defender for Cloud Apps activity records show user, app, file actions, session and download counts.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The app record shows its consented scopes, granting principal and related cloud activity. Defender for Cloud Apps activity records show user, app, file actions, session and download counts.

B:

The governance action logs show grant removal or app restriction and subsequent attempted access is denied. Defender for Cloud Apps activity records show user, app, file actions, session and download counts.

C:

Its threat details and supported database-specific recommendation align with the affected resource and response action. Defender for Cloud Apps activity records show user, app, file actions, session and download counts.

Question 417

A utility operator needs to triage a high-severity alert about suspicious command execution on an Azure VM. Its current security configuration cannot meet this specific operational requirement. Which action should the SOC implement?

  1. Check the actual incident timeline and supported data access scope before drawing conclusions
  2. Correlate workload alert with Azure resource and activity logs
  3. Review the specific security alert evidence rather than relying only on posture recommendations
  4. Open the Defender for Cloud workload protection alert and related machine evidence

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Workload-protection alerts reveal affected cloud resources and relevant activities.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Copilot output depends on data available to the experience and timing.

B:

A resource incident needs evidence of identity and control-plane actions.

C:

Secure score and recommendations are posture indicators, not proof of active exploitation.

Question 418

The media company SOC needs to triage a high-severity alert about suspicious command execution on an Azure VM, and its change advisory board asks for the technical basis of the recommended method. Which explanation identifies the most relevant capability?

  1. Remediation depends on the specific protected workload and observed issue.
  2. A resource incident needs evidence of identity and control-plane actions.
  3. Workload-protection alerts reveal affected cloud resources and relevant activities.
  4. One successful action does not automatically resolve all incident evidence.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Workload-protection alerts reveal affected cloud resources and relevant activities.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Prioritizing the remediation of a supported container or database resource alert does not triage a high-severity alert about suspicious command execution on an Azure VM.

B:

Tracing a compromised cloud resource through its associated subscription and permissions does not triage a high-severity alert about suspicious command execution on an Azure VM.

D:

Avoiding closing a Sentinel case solely because a containment action succeeded does not triage a high-severity alert about suspicious command execution on an Azure VM.

Question 419

A Defender for Cloud workload alert identifies a storage resource but the team has only Azure Activity subscription-change records. Why might the storage threat evidence still be missing?

  1. Subscription logs must contain every possible container, VM and storage malicious file event
  2. Azure Activity control-plane logs do not automatically contain all Defender for Cloud workload detection details
  3. A Defender incident can only be viewed after disabling all analytic rules
  4. A Sentinel Reader role automatically remediates cloud workloads

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Workload threat evidence is provided by the relevant Defender for Cloud plan and alert details, not every Azure Activity event.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Control-plane operations do not universally expose workload-level threat detections.

C:

Disabling detectors is not necessary for viewing existing alert context.

D:

Reader is a viewing role and cannot automatically execute remediation.

Question 420

Defender for Cloud raises a security alert on a production virtual machine. Which evidence most directly identifies the affected Azure workload and the detected threat?

  1. A Microsoft Purview sensitivity label is published to users
  2. An unrelated Microsoft 365 mailbox rule was created
  3. The Defender for Cloud alert details identify the resource, suspicious activity, severity and supporting evidence
  4. A Sentinel workbook title includes the production subscription name

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Workload protection alerts include the relevant protected resource and activity context for triage.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Classification policy publication does not establish a cloud compute threat.

B:

An unrelated mailbox audit event does not identify this virtual machine incident.

D:

A visual dashboard title is not an alert record with resource and threat evidence.