McAfee Secured

Microsoft SC-200 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-200

Exam Name Microsoft Security Operations Analyst

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Security Operations Analyst Associate

Microsoft SC-200 Bundle $44.99

Pass Microsoft SC-200 with Real Questions From Testking

Download Web's Best SC-200 Exam Preparation Materials Today

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-200 Questions & Answers

    499 Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers Testing Engine software allows you to practice questions and answers in real SC-200 exam environment.

  • SC-200 Video Course

    SC-200 Video Course

    47 Video Lectures

    SC-200 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass SC-200 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Security Operations Analyst exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-200 Study Guide

    441 PDF Pages

    Study Guide will give you a practical experience regarding the subject and provide an academic background. SC-200 Study Guide is available in PDF format.

Microsoft Security Operations Analyst (SC-200) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    499 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-200 Video Course

    Video Course

    47 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    441 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-200 Practice Test 33

Question 320

During a controlled investigation, a controlled attacker-behavior replay generates recognizable supported logs. Which observation most directly verifies the intended technical behavior?

  1. The record separately identifies the Credential Access tactic and an appropriate specific technique supported by observed telemetry
  2. A matching endpoint technique detection fires with the attack trace and an appropriate ATT&CK mapping
  3. A supported fusion/correlated incident groups relevant cross-signal evidence rather than creating it from one unrelated record
  4. The analytic rule matches the expected events with documented false-positive checks, not only a matching keyword

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The analytic rule matches the expected events with documented false-positive checks, not only a matching keyword.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The record separately identifies the Credential Access tactic and an appropriate specific technique supported by observed telemetry; the analytic rule matches the expected events with documented false-positive checks, not only a matching keyword.

B:

A matching endpoint technique detection fires with the attack trace and an appropriate ATT&CK mapping; the analytic rule matches the expected events with documented false-positive checks, not only a matching keyword.

C:

A supported fusion/correlated incident groups relevant cross-signal evidence rather than creating it from one unrelated record; the analytic rule matches the expected events with documented false-positive checks, not only a matching keyword.

Question 321

A hospital SOC needs to run a KQL rule on a configurable interval and lookback schedule. Its current security configuration cannot meet this specific operational requirement. Which action should the SOC implement?

  1. Create a scheduled Sentinel analytics rule for the validated KQL detection
  2. Correlate the anomalous finding with supporting security events and entity history
  3. Use a supported threat intelligence analytics rule or indicator-matching detection
  4. Choose an appropriate near-real-time Sentinel analytics rule

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Scheduled rules query data over configured execution windows.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Statistical deviation creates a hunting lead, not automatic attribution.

C:

TI rules correlate observed indicators against intelligence data.

D:

NRT rules evaluate on a shorter defined cadence than many scheduled queries.

Question 322

The financial services SOC SOC needs to run a KQL rule on a configurable interval and lookback schedule, and its change advisory board asks for the technical basis of the recommended method. Which explanation identifies the most relevant capability?

  1. Scheduled rules query data over configured execution windows.
  2. Detection validation requires actual signal evidence, not only a matching title.
  3. NRT rules evaluate on a shorter defined cadence than many scheduled queries.
  4. TI rules correlate observed indicators against intelligence data.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Scheduled rules query data over configured execution windows.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Validating a proposed new rule against realistic attacker behavior rather than a keyword match does not run a KQL rule on a configurable interval and lookback schedule.

C:

Identifying immediately arriving high-value events with near-real-time evaluation where supported does not run a KQL rule on a configurable interval and lookback schedule.

D:

Detecting matches to known threat indicators with relevant telemetry does not run a KQL rule on a configurable interval and lookback schedule.

Question 323

A scheduled Sentinel rule runs every five minutes but looks back only two minutes. Events arrive three minutes after they are generated and are frequently missed. What should be changed?

  1. Disable ingestion for delayed log sources
  2. Use an eDiscovery hold to retain the missing rule executions
  3. Increase the rule’s lookback window to cover supported ingestion latency and the intended evaluation interval
  4. Lower the workbook visualizer opacity

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The rule’s query window must encompass eligible records as they become available, with an appropriate interval/lookback relationship.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Stopping a delayed source cannot recover missing detection coverage.

B:

eDiscovery content holds do not affect Sentinel scheduled query execution.

D:

Workbook appearance does not address query time-window gaps.

Question 324

A scheduled Sentinel analytics rule is configured to run every 10 minutes and look back 30 minutes. A test alert fires. Which observation validates the timing settings rather than merely the presence of a rule?

  1. A Microsoft Defender endpoint alert exists with no Sentinel analytic rule reference
  2. A DCR is collecting logs at the expected ingestion volume
  3. A threat-intelligence feed is refreshing indicators once per day
  4. The analytic-rule configuration shows the 10-minute frequency and 30-minute lookup window used for the resulting query

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The scheduled query rule’s frequency and lookup window specify when and how far back its detection KQL searches.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A different product alert does not establish the Sentinel rule scheduling parameters.

B:

Data collection volume is independent of the analytic rule’s run cadence.

C:

Threat-feed refresh is unrelated to the analytic rule’s execution and lookback settings.

Question 325

A telecom provider needs to identify immediately arriving high-value events with near-real-time evaluation where supported. Its current security configuration cannot meet this specific operational requirement. Which action should the SOC implement?

  1. Map the high-level tactic separately from the concrete ATT&CK technique
  2. Choose an appropriate near-real-time Sentinel analytics rule
  3. Use a supported threat intelligence analytics rule or indicator-matching detection
  4. Create a scheduled Sentinel analytics rule for the validated KQL detection

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

NRT rules evaluate on a shorter defined cadence than many scheduled queries.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A tactic describes why while a technique describes how the adversary acts.

C:

TI rules correlate observed indicators against intelligence data.

D:

Scheduled rules query data over configured execution windows.

Question 326

The regional bank SOC needs to identify immediately arriving high-value events with near-real-time evaluation where supported, and its change advisory board asks for the technical basis of the recommended method. Which explanation identifies the most relevant capability?

  1. Behavioral correlation can combine distinct signals rather than a single static equality predicate.
  2. TI rules correlate observed indicators against intelligence data.
  3. Query precision reduces unhelpful alerts without suppressing the entire security product.
  4. NRT rules evaluate on a shorter defined cadence than many scheduled queries.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

NRT rules evaluate on a shorter defined cadence than many scheduled queries.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Combining suspicious cross-signal evidence where supported by a platform machine-learning detector does not identify immediately arriving high-value events with near-real-time evaluation where supported.

B:

Detecting matches to known threat indicators with relevant telemetry does not identify immediately arriving high-value events with near-real-time evaluation where supported.

C:

Avoiding repeated alerts from a poorly scoped broad detection query does not identify immediately arriving high-value events with near-real-time evaluation where supported.

Question 327

A near-real-time alert was expected shortly after an event but the team configured a standard scheduled rule with an hourly cadence. Which explanation best accounts for the specific failure?

  1. The detection lacks the actual threat-indicator matching logic or correct source correlation
  2. A supported multi-signal machine-learning detector requires corroborating evidence; one weak event cannot guarantee fusion
  3. The selected analytics rule type or run frequency does not provide the intended near-real-time evaluation
  4. UEBA context and corroborating behavior were not examined; anomaly alone is not a confirmed incident

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The selected analytics rule type or run frequency does not provide the intended near-real-time evaluation.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The detection lacks the actual threat-indicator matching logic or correct source correlation; the selected analytics rule type or run frequency does not provide the intended near-real-time evaluation.

B:

A supported multi-signal machine-learning detector requires corroborating evidence; one weak event cannot guarantee fusion; the selected analytics rule type or run frequency does not provide the intended near-real-time evaluation.

D:

UEBA context and corroborating behavior were not examined; anomaly alone is not a confirmed incident; the selected analytics rule type or run frequency does not provide the intended near-real-time evaluation.

Question 328

During a controlled investigation, a supported high-priority event is delivered to the Sentinel Analytics data source. Which observation most directly verifies the intended technical behavior?

  1. The indicator-matching analytic produces an alert carrying the matching observed IP and indicator context
  2. A supported fusion/correlated incident groups relevant cross-signal evidence rather than creating it from one unrelated record
  3. The configured near-real-time rule generates the expected alert at its supported evaluation cadence
  4. The analyst sees entity behavior baseline, deviations and correlated security events supporting or refuting the suspicion

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The configured near-real-time rule generates the expected alert at its supported evaluation cadence.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The indicator-matching analytic produces an alert carrying the matching observed IP and indicator context; the configured near-real-time rule generates the expected alert at its supported evaluation cadence.

B:

A supported fusion/correlated incident groups relevant cross-signal evidence rather than creating it from one unrelated record; the configured near-real-time rule generates the expected alert at its supported evaluation cadence.

D:

The analyst sees entity behavior baseline, deviations and correlated security events supporting or refuting the suspicion; the configured near-real-time rule generates the expected alert at its supported evaluation cadence.

Question 329

A manufacturer needs to detect matches to known threat indicators with relevant telemetry. Its current security configuration cannot meet this specific operational requirement. Which action should the SOC implement?

  1. Choose an appropriate near-real-time Sentinel analytics rule
  2. Use a supported threat intelligence analytics rule or indicator-matching detection
  3. Create a scheduled Sentinel analytics rule for the validated KQL detection
  4. Configure a supported custom detection response action with appropriate permissions

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

TI rules correlate observed indicators against intelligence data.

Incorrect Answers

A:

NRT rules evaluate on a shorter defined cadence than many scheduled queries.

C:

Scheduled rules query data over configured execution windows.

D:

Custom detection actions can initiate limited security responses based on rule matches.

Question 330

The logistics company SOC needs to detect matches to known threat indicators with relevant telemetry, and its change advisory board asks for the technical basis of the recommended method. Which explanation identifies the most relevant capability?

  1. Rule eligibility depends on its data schema and reliable event attribution.
  2. TI rules correlate observed indicators against intelligence data.
  3. NRT rules evaluate on a shorter defined cadence than many scheduled queries.
  4. Behavioral correlation can combine distinct signals rather than a single static equality predicate.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

TI rules correlate observed indicators against intelligence data.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Identifying the necessary columns and event identity when building a device-event custom detection does not detect matches to known threat indicators with relevant telemetry.

C:

Identifying immediately arriving high-value events with near-real-time evaluation where supported does not detect matches to known threat indicators with relevant telemetry.

D:

Combining suspicious cross-signal evidence where supported by a platform machine-learning detector does not detect matches to known threat indicators with relevant telemetry.