McAfee Secured

Microsoft SC-200 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-200

Exam Name Microsoft Security Operations Analyst

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Security Operations Analyst Associate

Microsoft SC-200 Bundle $44.99

Pass Microsoft SC-200 with Real Questions From Testking

Download Web's Best SC-200 Exam Preparation Materials Today

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-200 Questions & Answers

    499 Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers Testing Engine software allows you to practice questions and answers in real SC-200 exam environment.

  • SC-200 Video Course

    SC-200 Video Course

    47 Video Lectures

    SC-200 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass SC-200 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Security Operations Analyst exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-200 Study Guide

    441 PDF Pages

    Study Guide will give you a practical experience regarding the subject and provide an academic background. SC-200 Study Guide is available in PDF format.

Microsoft Security Operations Analyst (SC-200) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    499 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-200 Video Course

    Video Course

    47 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    441 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-200 Practice Test 28

Question 270

The government contractor SOC needs to avoid ingesting every Windows channel when only targeted security events are needed, and its change advisory board asks for the technical basis of the recommended method. Which explanation identifies the most relevant capability?

  1. WEF consolidates events on a collector rather than installing a new SIEM rule on every source.
  2. Log-category support and destination bindings govern the resulting records.
  3. WEF subscription filters reduce unrelated event volume.
  4. This establishes whether the loss occurs upstream of Sentinel.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

WEF subscription filters reduce unrelated event volume.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Centralizing security events from many domain-managed computers before forwarding into Sentinel does not avoid ingesting every Windows channel when only targeted security events are needed.

B:

Diagnosing why a configured diagnostic setting generates no events for a chosen category does not avoid ingesting every Windows channel when only targeted security events are needed.

D:

Distinguishing collector subscription failure from Sentinel-side parsing failure does not avoid ingesting every Windows channel when only targeted security events are needed.

Question 271

The Windows event collector forwards every Application and System event even though only defined security IDs are required. Which explanation best accounts for the specific failure?

  1. The WEF subscription lacks a restrictive XPath/event-selector filter
  2. The source-initiated subscription manager policy points to the wrong collector endpoint
  3. WEF collection succeeded; downstream agent/DCR routing or ingestion is the remaining problem
  4. The agent's effective DCR destination points to another workspace instead of the Sentinel workspace

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The WEF subscription lacks a restrictive XPath/event-selector filter.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The source-initiated subscription manager policy points to the wrong collector endpoint; the WEF subscription lacks a restrictive XPath/event-selector filter.

C:

WEF collection succeeded; downstream agent/DCR routing or ingestion is the remaining problem; the WEF subscription lacks a restrictive XPath/event-selector filter.

D:

The agent's effective DCR destination points to another workspace instead of the Sentinel workspace; the WEF subscription lacks a restrictive XPath/event-selector filter.

Question 272

During a controlled investigation, a source-initiated WEF subscription selects two approved security event IDs. Which observation most directly verifies the intended technical behavior?

  1. The collector's Forwarded Events log contains the selected event IDs but not unrelated test IDs
  2. The client establishes the subscription and events arrive in the collector's Forwarded Events log
  3. The event appears in Forwarded Events first, then the designated Sentinel workspace table
  4. The event appears in the intended SecurityEvent table with device identity and timestamp

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The collector's Forwarded Events log contains the selected event IDs but not unrelated test IDs.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The client establishes the subscription and events arrive in the collector's Forwarded Events log; the collector's Forwarded Events log contains the selected event IDs but not unrelated test IDs.

C:

The event appears in Forwarded Events first, then the designated Sentinel workspace table; the collector's Forwarded Events log contains the selected event IDs but not unrelated test IDs.

D:

The event appears in the intended SecurityEvent table with device identity and timestamp; the collector's Forwarded Events log contains the selected event IDs but not unrelated test IDs.

Question 273

A media company needs to collect Windows Security log events from Azure VMs through the supported agent connector. Its current security configuration cannot meet this specific operational requirement. Which action should the SOC implement?

  1. Specify approved Windows event XPath selectors in the DCR
  2. Onboard supported machines with Azure Arc and AMA then associate the correct DCR
  3. Configure Windows Security Events via AMA with an associated data collection rule
  4. Inspect source and attributes of the ingested indicator record

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

AMA and DCR govern supported Windows Security event collection.

Incorrect Answers

A:

XPath filtering selects the desired events before ingestion.

B:

Hybrid machine eligibility and DCR association determine what the collector receives.

D:

Indicator metadata explains provenance, type and confidence.

Question 274

The software firm SOC needs to collect Windows Security log events from Azure VMs through the supported agent connector, and its change advisory board asks for the technical basis of the recommended method. Which explanation identifies the most relevant capability?

  1. Hybrid machine eligibility and DCR association determine what the collector receives.
  2. Field drift can break ingestion or queries even when the log source remains connected.
  3. AMA and DCR govern supported Windows Security event collection.
  4. Agent installation alone does not determine which security events arrive.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

AMA and DCR govern supported Windows Security event collection.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Bringing events from selected on-prem Windows endpoints through Azure monitoring does not collect Windows Security log events from Azure VMs through the supported agent connector.

B:

Investigating a custom log query that fails after a vendor's schema update does not collect Windows Security log events from Azure VMs through the supported agent connector.

D:

Investigating a source that has AMA installed but no SecurityEvent data does not collect Windows Security log events from Azure VMs through the supported agent connector.

Question 275

A Windows VM has AMA installed but SecurityEvent contains none of the intended Event IDs. The assigned data collection rule selects only unrelated IDs. What is the direct fix?

  1. Change the VM’s display name in Defender inventory
  2. Create an Outlook email notification rule
  3. Update the assigned Windows Security Events DCR selection to include the required event IDs or collection set
  4. Move SharePoint files into a Purview retention label

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

An installed AMA agent only collects the events selected by the associated DCR.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Renaming inventory does not change Windows event collection.

B:

Defender email notification is not a Windows event DCR.

D:

Retention policy configuration is unrelated to SecurityEvent ingestion.

Question 276

Windows Security events are expected from an Azure VM through the AMA connector. Which result demonstrates that agent and DCR selection are functioning for event collection?

  1. Heartbeat rows appear without any SecurityEvent data
  2. SecurityEvent rows from the intended VM show the configured event IDs within the collection period
  3. An unrelated endpoint’s DeviceEvents table has entries
  4. The Azure subscription has an Activity log operation for VM start

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Matching SecurityEvent rows establish that Windows event IDs passed the selected AMA data collection rule into the workspace.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Heartbeat shows agent or host availability but not that the requested event IDs were selected and ingested.

C:

DeviceEvents belongs to a different Microsoft Defender telemetry pipeline.

D:

VM control-plane operations do not demonstrate Windows Security log data collection.

Question 277

A government contractor needs to limit collected Windows event IDs to a security team's defined audit scope. Its current security configuration cannot meet this specific operational requirement. Which action should the SOC implement?

  1. Onboard supported machines with Azure Arc and AMA then associate the correct DCR
  2. Configure Syslog via AMA and an associated DCR
  3. Inspect DCR association and selected event streams before changing analytic rules
  4. Specify approved Windows event XPath selectors in the DCR

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

XPath filtering selects the desired events before ingestion.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Hybrid machine eligibility and DCR association determine what the collector receives.

B:

Syslog via AMA is the intended connector for Linux Syslog streams.

C:

Agent installation alone does not determine which security events arrive.

Question 278

The insurance provider SOC needs to limit collected Windows event IDs to a security team's defined audit scope, and its change advisory board asks for the technical basis of the recommended method. Which explanation identifies the most relevant capability?

  1. Agent installation alone does not determine which security events arrive.
  2. XPath filtering selects the desired events before ingestion.
  3. AMA and DCR govern supported Windows Security event collection.
  4. Typed table columns improve accurate temporal queries.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

XPath filtering selects the desired events before ingestion.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Investigating a source that has AMA installed but no SecurityEvent data does not limit collected Windows event IDs to a security team's defined audit scope.

C:

Collecting Windows Security log events from Azure VMs through the supported agent connector does not limit collected Windows event IDs to a security team's defined audit scope.

D:

Correcting an incoming timestamp being stored as generic text does not limit collected Windows event IDs to a security team's defined audit scope.

Question 279

A DCR was supposed to collect Windows event ID 4625 but receives only 4624; the DCR XPath selectors omit 4625. Which explanation best accounts for the specific failure?

  1. The required Windows security event ID is missing from the DCR XPath expression
  2. The machine lacks correct Azure Arc onboarding or DCR association required for hybrid collection
  3. The agent's effective DCR destination points to another workspace instead of the Sentinel workspace
  4. The query omitted the recommended device and report identifiers needed to associate the custom detection with its originating endpoint event

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The required Windows security event ID is missing from the DCR XPath expression.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The machine lacks correct Azure Arc onboarding or DCR association required for hybrid collection; the required Windows security event ID is missing from the DCR XPath expression.

C:

The agent's effective DCR destination points to another workspace instead of the Sentinel workspace; the required Windows security event ID is missing from the DCR XPath expression.

D:

The query omitted the recommended device and report identifiers needed to associate the custom detection with its originating endpoint event; the required Windows security event ID is missing from the DCR XPath expression.

Question 280

During a controlled investigation, a Windows security event rule selects specific event IDs including 4625. Which observation most directly verifies the intended technical behavior?

  1. The machine shows the expected DCR association and Windows events arrive in the targeted workspace
  2. The event appears in the intended SecurityEvent table with device identity and timestamp
  3. The resulting test alert points to the correct device and original event, with a meaningful process tree where supported
  4. A controlled 4625 event is received in SecurityEvent while unselected categories remain absent

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A controlled 4625 event is received in SecurityEvent while unselected categories remain absent.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The machine shows the expected DCR association and Windows events arrive in the targeted workspace; a controlled 4625 event is received in SecurityEvent while unselected categories remain absent.

B:

The event appears in the intended SecurityEvent table with device identity and timestamp; a controlled 4625 event is received in SecurityEvent while unselected categories remain absent.

C:

The resulting test alert points to the correct device and original event, with a meaningful process tree where supported; a controlled 4625 event is received in SecurityEvent while unselected categories remain absent.