McAfee Secured

Microsoft MS-700 Bundle

Exam Code: MS-700

Exam Name Managing Microsoft Teams

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Microsoft MS-700 Bundle $44.99
MS-700 Sample 1 MS-700 Sample 2 MS-700 Sample 3 MS-700 Sample 4 MS-700 Sample 5 MS-700 Sample 6 MS-700 Sample 7 MS-700 Sample 8 MS-700 Sample 9 MS-700 Sample 10

Pass Microsoft MS-700 with Real Questions From Testking

Download Web's Best MS-700 Exam Preparation Materials Today

  • Questions & Answers

    MS-700 Questions & Answers

    454 Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers Testing Engine software allows you to practice questions and answers in real MS-700 exam environment.

  • MS-700 Video Course

    MS-700 Video Course

    93 Video Lectures

    MS-700 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass MS-700 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Managing Microsoft Teams exam.
  • Study Guide

    MS-700 Study Guide

    204 PDF Pages

    Study Guide will give you a practical experience regarding the subject and provide an academic background. MS-700 Study Guide is available in PDF format.

Managing Microsoft Teams (MS-700) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    454 Questions

    $124.99
  • MS-700 Video Course

    Video Course

    93 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    204 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft MS-700 Practice Test 9

Question 80

A college wants Teams chat messages retained under a different schedule from SharePoint documents. Which governance practice would help sustain the improvement?

  1. Maintain a feature-to-license entitlement matrix during Teams security policy reviews.
  2. Audit label publication and meeting policy conflicts before changes to confidentiality defaults.
  3. Review security policy coverage and licensing before enabling new Teams collaboration integrations.
  4. Document retention owners and test policy impact before changing message lifetimes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Document retention owners and test policy impact before changing message lifetimes. This reduces recurrence because: Teams message retention is governed through Microsoft Purview rather than by deleting the team or manually clearing client caches. The immediate supported action is: Configure Microsoft Purview retention policies for Teams chat and channel messages aligned with the approved retention schedule.

Other Answers

A:

Maintain a feature-to-license entitlement matrix during Teams security policy reviews. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: An administrator attempts to enforce an advanced Teams meeting protection label for users without the required license. It is not the best preventive control for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Document retention owners and test policy impact before changing message lifetimes.

B:

Audit label publication and meeting policy conflicts before changes to confidentiality defaults. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: A confidential legal review requires consistent supported protections across many Teams meetings. It is not the best preventive control for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Document retention owners and test policy impact before changing message lifetimes.

C:

Review security policy coverage and licensing before enabling new Teams collaboration integrations. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: A security team needs consistent protection from malicious URLs posted in internal Teams chats. It is not the best preventive control for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Document retention owners and test policy impact before changing message lifetimes.

Question 81

A confidential legal review requires consistent supported protections across many Teams meetings. Which Teams management change most directly resolves the issue?

  1. Configure Microsoft Purview retention policies for Teams chat and channel messages aligned with the approved retention schedule.
  2. Configure appropriate Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Safe Links and anti-phishing protections consistent with the tenant's licensing.
  3. Publish a Microsoft Purview sensitivity label with supported Teams meeting controls to the intended organizers.
  4. Use Microsoft Purview Information Barriers policies to restrict incompatible communication segments after confirming licensing and prerequisites.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Publish a Microsoft Purview sensitivity label with supported Teams meeting controls to the intended organizers. The reason is: A sensitivity label can apply supported protection settings to meetings when licensing, publication, and policy prerequisites are satisfied. Validate it by: Create an approved test meeting with the label and inspect the resulting meeting protection settings.

Other Answers

A:

Configure Microsoft Purview retention policies for Teams chat and channel messages aligned with the approved retention schedule. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: A regulated brokerage must keep Teams channel conversations for a prescribed period even when users delete chat threads. It is not the best configuration decision for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Publish a Microsoft Purview sensitivity label with supported Teams meeting controls to the intended organizers.

B:

Configure appropriate Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Safe Links and anti-phishing protections consistent with the tenant's licensing. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: A security team needs consistent protection from malicious URLs posted in internal Teams chats. It is not the best configuration decision for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Publish a Microsoft Purview sensitivity label with supported Teams meeting controls to the intended organizers.

D:

Use Microsoft Purview Information Barriers policies to restrict incompatible communication segments after confirming licensing and prerequisites. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: Trading and research staff must not communicate through Teams under the firm's information barrier rules. It is not the best configuration decision for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Publish a Microsoft Purview sensitivity label with supported Teams meeting controls to the intended organizers.

Question 82

A confidential legal review requires consistent supported protections across many Teams meetings. Which platform principle makes the chosen approach appropriate?

  1. Communication Compliance supports review workflows for supported policy matches; it is not a replacement for message transport or meeting policies.
  2. A sensitivity label can apply supported protection settings to meetings when licensing, publication, and policy prerequisites are satisfied.
  3. Insider Risk Management correlates supported risk indicators under approved privacy controls; it is not simply a Teams notification toggle.
  4. Information Barriers enforce supported communication and collaboration restrictions between designated organizational segments.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A sensitivity label can apply supported protection settings to meetings when licensing, publication, and policy prerequisites are satisfied. This accounts for why the proposed Teams management action is appropriate: Publish a Microsoft Purview sensitivity label with supported Teams meeting controls to the intended organizers. Test the result with: Create an approved test meeting with the label and inspect the resulting meeting protection settings.

Other Answers

A:

Communication Compliance supports review workflows for supported policy matches; it is not a replacement for message transport or meeting policies. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: A compliance office must review specific risky language patterns in Teams messages through an auditable process. It is not the best service mechanism for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: A sensitivity label can apply supported protection settings to meetings when licensing, publication, and policy prerequisites are satisfied.

C:

Insider Risk Management correlates supported risk indicators under approved privacy controls; it is not simply a Teams notification toggle. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: An internal investigations team needs a governed way to assess collaboration-related insider risk indicators. It is not the best service mechanism for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: A sensitivity label can apply supported protection settings to meetings when licensing, publication, and policy prerequisites are satisfied.

D:

Information Barriers enforce supported communication and collaboration restrictions between designated organizational segments. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: Trading and research staff must not communicate through Teams under the firm's information barrier rules. It is not the best service mechanism for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: A sensitivity label can apply supported protection settings to meetings when licensing, publication, and policy prerequisites are satisfied.

Question 83

A confidential legal review requires consistent supported protections across many Teams meetings. Which post-change verification is most relevant?

  1. Inventory the pilot licenses and confirm the planned protection controls appear and are enforceable for assigned users.
  2. Test a representative compliant and noncompliant user sign-in and inspect Microsoft Entra sign-in logs and applied policies.
  3. Send a synthetic policy-test string in an authorized test chat and inspect the resulting DLP event and user notification.
  4. Create an approved test meeting with the label and inspect the resulting meeting protection settings.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Create an approved test meeting with the label and inspect the resulting meeting protection settings. This is the relevant evidence because the recommended change is: Publish a Microsoft Purview sensitivity label with supported Teams meeting controls to the intended organizers. Its underlying mechanism is: A sensitivity label can apply supported protection settings to meetings when licensing, publication, and policy prerequisites are satisfied.

Other Answers

A:

Inventory the pilot licenses and confirm the planned protection controls appear and are enforceable for assigned users. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: An administrator attempts to enforce an advanced Teams meeting protection label for users without the required license. It is not the best validation test for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Create an approved test meeting with the label and inspect the resulting meeting protection settings.

B:

Test a representative compliant and noncompliant user sign-in and inspect Microsoft Entra sign-in logs and applied policies. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: Contractors can access Teams from unmanaged personal devices despite a corporate compliance requirement. It is not the best validation test for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Create an approved test meeting with the label and inspect the resulting meeting protection settings.

C:

Send a synthetic policy-test string in an authorized test chat and inspect the resulting DLP event and user notification. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: A payroll group inadvertently sends test payment-card numbers into a broad Teams channel. It is not the best validation test for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Create an approved test meeting with the label and inspect the resulting meeting protection settings.

Question 84

A confidential legal review requires consistent supported protections across many Teams meetings. Which oversight action best supports ongoing compliance?

  1. Document reviewer access, policy purposes, and retention of investigations.
  2. Review DLP false positives with compliance owners and maintain documented exceptions.
  3. Audit label publication and meeting policy conflicts before changes to confidentiality defaults.
  4. Review delegated Teams administrator role membership quarterly and remove temporary elevations.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Audit label publication and meeting policy conflicts before changes to confidentiality defaults. This reduces recurrence because: A sensitivity label can apply supported protection settings to meetings when licensing, publication, and policy prerequisites are satisfied. The immediate supported action is: Publish a Microsoft Purview sensitivity label with supported Teams meeting controls to the intended organizers.

Other Answers

A:

Document reviewer access, policy purposes, and retention of investigations. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: A compliance office must review specific risky language patterns in Teams messages through an auditable process. It is not the best preventive control for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Audit label publication and meeting policy conflicts before changes to confidentiality defaults.

B:

Review DLP false positives with compliance owners and maintain documented exceptions. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: A payroll group inadvertently sends test payment-card numbers into a broad Teams channel. It is not the best preventive control for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Audit label publication and meeting policy conflicts before changes to confidentiality defaults.

D:

Review delegated Teams administrator role membership quarterly and remove temporary elevations. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: A support engineer only needs to manage Teams device firmware but requests Global Administrator access. It is not the best preventive control for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Audit label publication and meeting policy conflicts before changes to confidentiality defaults.

Question 85

A board secretary wants organizers to choose a governed meeting confidentiality label rather than configure every protection manually. What configuration or administrative action best meets the requirement?

  1. Use Microsoft Purview Information Barriers policies to restrict incompatible communication segments after confirming licensing and prerequisites.
  2. Publish a Microsoft Purview sensitivity label with supported Teams meeting controls to the intended organizers.
  3. Configure Microsoft Purview retention policies for Teams chat and channel messages aligned with the approved retention schedule.
  4. Configure a Microsoft Entra Conditional Access policy targeting the appropriate users and Microsoft Teams cloud application with safe exclusions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Publish a Microsoft Purview sensitivity label with supported Teams meeting controls to the intended organizers. The reason is: A sensitivity label can apply supported protection settings to meetings when licensing, publication, and policy prerequisites are satisfied. Validate it by: Create an approved test meeting with the label and inspect the resulting meeting protection settings.

Other Answers

A:

Use Microsoft Purview Information Barriers policies to restrict incompatible communication segments after confirming licensing and prerequisites. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: Trading and research staff must not communicate through Teams under the firm's information barrier rules. It is not the best configuration decision for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Publish a Microsoft Purview sensitivity label with supported Teams meeting controls to the intended organizers.

C:

Configure Microsoft Purview retention policies for Teams chat and channel messages aligned with the approved retention schedule. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: A regulated brokerage must keep Teams channel conversations for a prescribed period even when users delete chat threads. It is not the best configuration decision for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Publish a Microsoft Purview sensitivity label with supported Teams meeting controls to the intended organizers.

D:

Configure a Microsoft Entra Conditional Access policy targeting the appropriate users and Microsoft Teams cloud application with safe exclusions. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: Contractors can access Teams from unmanaged personal devices despite a corporate compliance requirement. It is not the best configuration decision for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Publish a Microsoft Purview sensitivity label with supported Teams meeting controls to the intended organizers.

Question 86

A board secretary wants organizers to choose a governed meeting confidentiality label rather than configure every protection manually. What Teams or Microsoft 365 behavior explains the solution?

  1. A sensitivity label can apply supported protection settings to meetings when licensing, publication, and policy prerequisites are satisfied.
  2. Communication Compliance supports review workflows for supported policy matches; it is not a replacement for message transport or meeting policies.
  3. Information Barriers enforce supported communication and collaboration restrictions between designated organizational segments.
  4. Built-in Teams administrative roles provide different management scopes; global admin is usually unnecessary for routine device or messaging administration.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

A sensitivity label can apply supported protection settings to meetings when licensing, publication, and policy prerequisites are satisfied. This accounts for why the proposed Teams management action is appropriate: Publish a Microsoft Purview sensitivity label with supported Teams meeting controls to the intended organizers. Test the result with: Create an approved test meeting with the label and inspect the resulting meeting protection settings.

Other Answers

B:

Communication Compliance supports review workflows for supported policy matches; it is not a replacement for message transport or meeting policies. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: A compliance office must review specific risky language patterns in Teams messages through an auditable process. It is not the best service mechanism for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: A sensitivity label can apply supported protection settings to meetings when licensing, publication, and policy prerequisites are satisfied.

C:

Information Barriers enforce supported communication and collaboration restrictions between designated organizational segments. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: Trading and research staff must not communicate through Teams under the firm's information barrier rules. It is not the best service mechanism for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: A sensitivity label can apply supported protection settings to meetings when licensing, publication, and policy prerequisites are satisfied.

D:

Built-in Teams administrative roles provide different management scopes; global admin is usually unnecessary for routine device or messaging administration. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: A support engineer only needs to manage Teams device firmware but requests Global Administrator access. It is not the best service mechanism for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: A sensitivity label can apply supported protection settings to meetings when licensing, publication, and policy prerequisites are satisfied.

Question 87

A board secretary wants organizers to choose a governed meeting confidentiality label rather than configure every protection manually. How should the administrator confirm the solution in a pilot?

  1. Validate that the delegated administrator can perform the approved operation and cannot change unrelated tenant-wide controls.
  2. Inventory the pilot licenses and confirm the planned protection controls appear and are enforceable for assigned users.
  3. Test a representative compliant and noncompliant user sign-in and inspect Microsoft Entra sign-in logs and applied policies.
  4. Create an approved test meeting with the label and inspect the resulting meeting protection settings.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Create an approved test meeting with the label and inspect the resulting meeting protection settings. This is the relevant evidence because the recommended change is: Publish a Microsoft Purview sensitivity label with supported Teams meeting controls to the intended organizers. Its underlying mechanism is: A sensitivity label can apply supported protection settings to meetings when licensing, publication, and policy prerequisites are satisfied.

Other Answers

A:

Validate that the delegated administrator can perform the approved operation and cannot change unrelated tenant-wide controls. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: A support engineer only needs to manage Teams device firmware but requests Global Administrator access. It is not the best validation test for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Create an approved test meeting with the label and inspect the resulting meeting protection settings.

B:

Inventory the pilot licenses and confirm the planned protection controls appear and are enforceable for assigned users. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: An administrator attempts to enforce an advanced Teams meeting protection label for users without the required license. It is not the best validation test for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Create an approved test meeting with the label and inspect the resulting meeting protection settings.

C:

Test a representative compliant and noncompliant user sign-in and inspect Microsoft Entra sign-in logs and applied policies. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: Contractors can access Teams from unmanaged personal devices despite a corporate compliance requirement. It is not the best validation test for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Create an approved test meeting with the label and inspect the resulting meeting protection settings.

Question 88

A board secretary wants organizers to choose a governed meeting confidentiality label rather than configure every protection manually. What follow-up management standard should be maintained?

  1. Document reviewer access, policy purposes, and retention of investigations.
  2. Require legal, privacy, and security approval before enabling or broadening insider-risk detections.
  3. Audit label publication and meeting policy conflicts before changes to confidentiality defaults.
  4. Review segment assignments after reorganizations and document restricted-business-unit boundaries.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Audit label publication and meeting policy conflicts before changes to confidentiality defaults. This reduces recurrence because: A sensitivity label can apply supported protection settings to meetings when licensing, publication, and policy prerequisites are satisfied. The immediate supported action is: Publish a Microsoft Purview sensitivity label with supported Teams meeting controls to the intended organizers.

Other Answers

A:

Document reviewer access, policy purposes, and retention of investigations. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: A compliance office must review specific risky language patterns in Teams messages through an auditable process. It is not the best preventive control for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Audit label publication and meeting policy conflicts before changes to confidentiality defaults.

B:

Require legal, privacy, and security approval before enabling or broadening insider-risk detections. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: An internal investigations team needs a governed way to assess collaboration-related insider risk indicators. It is not the best preventive control for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Audit label publication and meeting policy conflicts before changes to confidentiality defaults.

D:

Review segment assignments after reorganizations and document restricted-business-unit boundaries. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: Trading and research staff must not communicate through Teams under the firm's information barrier rules. It is not the best preventive control for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Audit label publication and meeting policy conflicts before changes to confidentiality defaults.

Question 89

A payroll group inadvertently sends test payment-card numbers into a broad Teams channel. What is the best direct operational response?

  1. Create a Microsoft Purview DLP policy scoped to Teams chat and channel messages for the protected sensitive information types.
  2. Use Microsoft Purview Information Barriers policies to restrict incompatible communication segments after confirming licensing and prerequisites.
  3. Evaluate Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management policies for approved Teams-related risk signals and requisite licensing.
  4. Check the feature's Microsoft 365 security and compliance licensing prerequisites before configuring Teams alerting and policy enforcement.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Create a Microsoft Purview DLP policy scoped to Teams chat and channel messages for the protected sensitive information types. The reason is: Purview DLP evaluates supported Teams message content and can enforce configured actions on matching sensitive data. Validate it by: Send a synthetic policy-test string in an authorized test chat and inspect the resulting DLP event and user notification.

Other Answers

B:

Use Microsoft Purview Information Barriers policies to restrict incompatible communication segments after confirming licensing and prerequisites. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: Trading and research staff must not communicate through Teams under the firm's information barrier rules. It is not the best configuration decision for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Create a Microsoft Purview DLP policy scoped to Teams chat and channel messages for the protected sensitive information types.

C:

Evaluate Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management policies for approved Teams-related risk signals and requisite licensing. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: An internal investigations team needs a governed way to assess collaboration-related insider risk indicators. It is not the best configuration decision for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Create a Microsoft Purview DLP policy scoped to Teams chat and channel messages for the protected sensitive information types.

D:

Check the feature's Microsoft 365 security and compliance licensing prerequisites before configuring Teams alerting and policy enforcement. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: An administrator attempts to enforce an advanced Teams meeting protection label for users without the required license. It is not the best configuration decision for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Create a Microsoft Purview DLP policy scoped to Teams chat and channel messages for the protected sensitive information types.

Question 90

A payroll group inadvertently sends test payment-card numbers into a broad Teams channel. Why does the recommended configuration address the requirement?

  1. Purview DLP evaluates supported Teams message content and can enforce configured actions on matching sensitive data.
  2. Conditional Access evaluates user, device, risk, and session conditions at authentication rather than merely adjusting Teams messaging permissions.
  3. Teams message retention is governed through Microsoft Purview rather than by deleting the team or manually clearing client caches.
  4. Built-in Teams administrative roles provide different management scopes; global admin is usually unnecessary for routine device or messaging administration.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Purview DLP evaluates supported Teams message content and can enforce configured actions on matching sensitive data. This accounts for why the proposed Teams management action is appropriate: Create a Microsoft Purview DLP policy scoped to Teams chat and channel messages for the protected sensitive information types. Test the result with: Send a synthetic policy-test string in an authorized test chat and inspect the resulting DLP event and user notification.

Other Answers

B:

Conditional Access evaluates user, device, risk, and session conditions at authentication rather than merely adjusting Teams messaging permissions. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: Contractors can access Teams from unmanaged personal devices despite a corporate compliance requirement. It is not the best service mechanism for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Purview DLP evaluates supported Teams message content and can enforce configured actions on matching sensitive data.

C:

Teams message retention is governed through Microsoft Purview rather than by deleting the team or manually clearing client caches. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: A regulated brokerage must keep Teams channel conversations for a prescribed period even when users delete chat threads. It is not the best service mechanism for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Purview DLP evaluates supported Teams message content and can enforce configured actions on matching sensitive data.

D:

Built-in Teams administrative roles provide different management scopes; global admin is usually unnecessary for routine device or messaging administration. This addresses another Teams management situation, such as: A support engineer only needs to manage Teams device firmware but requests Global Administrator access. It is not the best service mechanism for the stated scenario. The appropriate answer for this scenario is: Purview DLP evaluates supported Teams message content and can enforce configured actions on matching sensitive data.