McAfee Secured

Microsoft AZ-700 Bundle

Exam Code: AZ-700

Exam Name Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Azure Network Engineer Associate

Microsoft AZ-700 Bundle $44.99

Pass Microsoft AZ-700 with Real Questions From Testking

Download Web's Best AZ-700 Exam Preparation Materials Today

  • Questions & Answers

    AZ-700 Questions & Answers

    406 Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers Testing Engine software allows you to practice questions and answers in real AZ-700 exam environment.

  • AZ-700 Video Course

    AZ-700 Video Course

    64 Video Lectures

    AZ-700 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass AZ-700 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions exam.
  • Study Guide

    AZ-700 Study Guide

    762 PDF Pages

    Study Guide will give you a practical experience regarding the subject and provide an academic background. AZ-700 Study Guide is available in PDF format.

Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions (AZ-700) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    406 Questions

    $124.99
  • AZ-700 Video Course

    Video Course

    64 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    762 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft AZ-700 Practice Test 96

Question 950

A SaaS offering must require explicit approval before cross-tenant private consumers connect. Which change should the network engineer make?

  1. Private Link service access visibility
  2. Private Endpoint migration cutover
  3. Private Link service provider design
  4. Private Link service alias distribution

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The intended behavior is to restrict eligible consumers through controlled visibility and approval settings. Private Link service access visibility is the direct configuration or deployment choice.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This choice updates endpoint connections, DNS and service firewall settings together during a resource move. It leaves the specific need to restrict eligible consumers through controlled visibility and approval settings unaddressed.

C:

Private Link service provider design exposes a customer-hosted service behind a supported Azure Standard Load Balancer through Private Link. The current problem instead requires a control that restricts eligible consumers through controlled visibility and approval settings.

D:

That approach gives authorized consumers a service alias to request private endpoints without using the full resource ID; it does not replace Private Link service access visibility for the constraint in this scenario.

Question 951

Two corporate locations have different ExpressRoute circuits and must communicate privately through Global Reach. Which network component or setting is the best fit?

  1. ExpressRoute BGP prefix advertisement
  2. ExpressRoute circuit provisioning
  3. ExpressRoute Global Reach
  4. ExpressRoute encryption over private connectivity

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This choice connects on-premises sites via their ExpressRoute circuits through provider-enabled private connectivity.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This choice exchanges approved on-premises routes over correct BGP peer sessions. It leaves the specific need to connect on-premises sites via their ExpressRoute circuits through provider-enabled private connectivity unaddressed.

B:

ExpressRoute circuit provisioning creates the provider-backed private connectivity circuit before linking Azure VNets. The current problem instead requires a control that connects on-premises sites via their ExpressRoute circuits through provider-enabled private connectivity.

D:

ExpressRoute encryption over private connectivity adds a supported encryption overlay when private circuit transport alone is insufficient. The current problem instead requires a control that connects on-premises sites via their ExpressRoute circuits through provider-enabled private connectivity.

Question 952

A global API continues routing to a down primary due to misconfigured origin priorities. Which configuration addresses the stated network constraint?

  1. Front Door origin group priority failover
  2. Front Door origin weighting for load distribution
  3. Front Door route and origin mapping
  4. Front Door WAF policy association

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The intended behavior is to select healthy primary and secondary origins using configured priority and health. Front Door origin group priority failover is the direct configuration or deployment choice.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Front Door origin weighting for load distribution is useful when the goal is to balance requests among equally prioritized healthy origins using configured weights. Here, the required behavior is to select healthy primary and secondary origins using configured priority and health.

C:

This alternative connects the matching frontend domain/path to the intended origin group, which solves a different networking task. It does not directly select healthy primary and secondary origins using configured priority and health.

D:

Front Door WAF policy association applies supported application-layer rules at the globally distributed edge. The current problem instead requires a control that selects healthy primary and secondary origins using configured priority and health.

Question 953

An engineer must define accepted protocols and path patterns for a new edge route. Which configuration should the team verify or implement first?

  1. Front Door Rules Engine rewrite
  2. Front Door Private Link to supported origin
  3. Front Door route and origin mapping
  4. Front Door custom domain binding

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Front Door route and origin mapping connects the matching frontend domain/path to the intended origin group.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Front Door Rules Engine rewrite is useful when the goal is to change the upstream URL path while the client's visible URL remains stable. Here, the required behavior is to connect the matching frontend domain/path to the intended origin group.

B:

This choice connects an eligible Front Door Premium origin privately without exposing it broadly. It leaves the specific need to connect the matching frontend domain/path to the intended origin group unaddressed.

D:

Front Door custom domain binding configures an approved domain, DNS validation and certificate for the edge endpoint. The current problem instead requires a control that connects the matching frontend domain/path to the intended origin group.

Question 954

A private endpoint already has a correct private DNS A record and the client can resolve the service FQDN, but its connection string hard-codes the endpoint IP and TLS name verification fails. What should change?

  1. Private Endpoint hostname-specific TLS handling
  2. Private Endpoint from on-premises via hybrid route
  3. Private Endpoint resource-specific authorization
  4. Private Endpoint DNS A-record integration

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The client should use the original service FQDN, letting the existing private DNS map it to the endpoint IP while TLS verifies the certificate hostname.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Hybrid VPN or ExpressRoute routing is irrelevant because the endpoint is already reachable from the client VNet.

C:

Provider resource authorization is not the issue: the connection reaches the approved resource but fails server-name validation.

D:

The private DNS A record already resolves correctly; modifying the zone will not repair a client that bypasses DNS and connects to a literal IP.

Question 955

A support engineer travelling off-site needs authenticated access to an Azure management VNet. Which choice matches the specific technical condition?

  1. P2S VPN client profile generation
  2. Point-to-site VPN for individual users
  3. VPN client device deployment validation
  4. P2S gateway SKU and concurrent-user limits

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Point-to-site VPN for individual users is appropriate because it provides encrypted client-to-VNet connectivity without establishing a site-to-site office tunnel.

Incorrect Answers

A:

P2S VPN client profile generation delivers the correct gateway endpoints, routes and authentication settings to client devices. The current problem instead requires a control that provides encrypted client-to-VNet connectivity without establishing a site-to-site office tunnel.

C:

VPN client device deployment validation is useful when the goal is to validate supported OS, client version, tunnel profile and endpoint requirements. Here, the required behavior is to provide encrypted client-to-VNet connectivity without establishing a site-to-site office tunnel.

D:

P2S gateway SKU and concurrent-user limits sizes point-to-site connectivity for the expected simultaneous remote clients. The current problem instead requires a control that provides encrypted client-to-VNet connectivity without establishing a site-to-site office tunnel.

Question 956

A ruleset has an endpoint but no rule mapping the corporate zone to a DNS server. Which network component or setting is the best fit?

  1. DNS forwarding ruleset and rules
  2. Azure DNS Private Resolver inbound endpoint
  3. Custom DNS server settings on VNet
  4. Ruleset VNet association

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The intended behavior is to match a domain suffix and forwards queries to designated DNS target servers. DNS forwarding ruleset and rules is the direct configuration or deployment choice.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Azure DNS Private Resolver inbound endpoint accepts DNS queries arriving from on-premises or connected networks into Azure resolution. The current problem instead requires a control that matches a domain suffix and forwards queries to designated DNS target servers.

C:

That approach directs VNet-resident clients to selected DNS servers for specialized resolution; it does not replace DNS forwarding ruleset and rules for the constraint in this scenario.

D:

This alternative links a forwarding ruleset to the VNets that need to use it, which solves a different networking task. It does not directly match a domain suffix and forwards queries to designated DNS target servers.

Question 957

A WAF policy exists but is not associated with the public application frontend. What is the most defensible solution for this case?

  1. WAF policy association to listener or domain
  2. WAF detection mode for tuning
  3. Custom WAF rule for scoped conditions
  4. WAF on Application Gateway for regional web protection

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

WAF policy association to listener or domain binds the WAF policy to the supported application gateway listener or edge domain.

Incorrect Answers

B:

WAF detection mode for tuning is useful when the goal is to log matching malicious patterns without blocking legitimate traffic during a controlled baseline. Here, the required behavior is to bind the WAF policy to the supported application gateway listener or edge domain.

C:

Although Custom WAF rule for scoped conditions matches an application-specific condition such as an approved IP, header or path and applies policy, that is not sufficient to bind the WAF policy to the supported application gateway listener or edge domain in this case.

D:

Although WAF on Application Gateway for regional web protection inspects HTTP/S requests at a regional application gateway using supported WAF policies, that is not sufficient to bind the WAF policy to the supported application gateway listener or edge domain in this case.

Question 958

An administrator needs to authorize a new workload subnet for a locked-down PaaS account. Which choice matches the specific technical condition?

  1. PaaS resource firewall VNet rule
  2. Service endpoint diagnostic separation
  3. Private Endpoint for hybrid private-service consumers
  4. VNet service endpoint enablement

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The relevant action is PaaS resource firewall VNet rule: it permits the specified subnet at the target managed service after a service endpoint is enabled.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This choice checks source subnet configuration, resource firewall rules and actual service reachability. It leaves the specific need to permit the specified subnet at the target managed service after a service endpoint is enabled unaddressed.

C:

This alternative uses an approved private endpoint with hybrid DNS and VPN/ExpressRoute reachability when on-premises clients require private PaaS access, which solves a different networking task. It does not directly permit the specified subnet at the target managed service after a service endpoint is enabled.

D:

Although VNet service endpoint enablement extends selected Azure service routing and service identity from an approved VNet subnet, that is not sufficient to permit the specified subnet at the target managed service after a service endpoint is enabled in this case.

Question 959

An administrator wants an entire on-premises LAN to route to private Azure VMs and incorrectly proposes creating a single Private Endpoint. Which network component is needed instead?

  1. Private Link service alias distribution
  2. Private Endpoint DNS A-record integration
  3. Private Endpoint from on-premises via hybrid route
  4. A site-to-site VPN Gateway or ExpressRoute connection with appropriate routes

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A routed site-to-site VPN or ExpressRoute circuit connects the on-premises network to selected Azure VNet prefixes as required.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A Private Link alias identifies a particular service and does not provide general IP routing for an on-premises LAN.

B:

A Private Endpoint DNS record names a service private IP, not an on-premises-to-Azure routed network connection.

C:

A Private Endpoint can be reached from on-premises after hybrid networking exists, but does not establish a tunnel to all Azure VMs.

Question 960

An engineer is validating BGP ASNs, peer addresses and route propagation. Which change should the network engineer make?

  1. Microsoft peering requirements on ExpressRoute
  2. ExpressRoute BGP prefix advertisement
  3. ExpressRoute peering and connection diagnostics
  4. ExpressRoute private peering

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

ExpressRoute BGP prefix advertisement is appropriate because it exchanges approved on-premises routes over correct BGP peer sessions.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Microsoft peering requirements on ExpressRoute enables approved Microsoft service access over Microsoft peering rather than private VNet routes. The current problem instead requires a control that exchanges approved on-premises routes over correct BGP peer sessions.

C:

This choice checks provider provisioning, BGP state and Azure connection health before making changes. It leaves the specific need to exchange approved on-premises routes over correct BGP peer sessions unaddressed.

D:

This choice provides private routing to VNet private address spaces over an ExpressRoute circuit. It leaves the specific need to exchange approved on-premises routes over correct BGP peer sessions unaddressed.