McAfee Secured

Microsoft AZ-700 Bundle

Exam Code: AZ-700

Exam Name Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Azure Network Engineer Associate

Microsoft AZ-700 Bundle $44.99

Pass Microsoft AZ-700 with Real Questions From Testking

Download Web's Best AZ-700 Exam Preparation Materials Today

  • Questions & Answers

    AZ-700 Questions & Answers

    406 Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers Testing Engine software allows you to practice questions and answers in real AZ-700 exam environment.

  • AZ-700 Video Course

    AZ-700 Video Course

    64 Video Lectures

    AZ-700 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass AZ-700 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions exam.
  • Study Guide

    AZ-700 Study Guide

    762 PDF Pages

    Study Guide will give you a practical experience regarding the subject and provide an academic background. AZ-700 Study Guide is available in PDF format.

Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions (AZ-700) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    406 Questions

    $124.99
  • AZ-700 Video Course

    Video Course

    64 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    762 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft AZ-700 Practice Test 92

Question 910

An engineer must validate the impact of a new deny rule on one destination port. Which Azure control would meet the operational need?

  1. Application Security Group membership
  2. NSG inbound rule source and port
  3. IP flow verify for NSG traffic decision
  4. NSG outbound rule destination and port

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

IP flow verify for NSG traffic decision tests a specified source/destination/port and reports the allowing or blocking NSG rule.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative groups VM interfaces by application role for NSG rule targeting, which solves a different networking task. It does not directly test a specified source/destination/port and reports the allowing or blocking NSG rule.

B:

This choice restricts traffic entering a NIC or subnet by source, destination and service port. It leaves the specific need to test a specified source/destination/port and reports the allowing or blocking NSG rule unaddressed.

D:

Although NSG outbound rule destination and port restricts workloads initiating network connections toward disallowed destinations, that is not sufficient to test a specified source/destination/port and reports the allowing or blocking NSG rule in this case.

Question 911

A team expects an NSG rule to affect endpoint traffic but subnet network policies were not enabled. What is the most appropriate next design decision?

  1. Private Endpoint subnet placement
  2. Private Endpoint NSG and route policy support
  3. Network-level connectivity prerequisite for remote Private Endpoints
  4. Private Endpoint approval workflow

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The intended behavior is to apply enabled private endpoint network policies when traffic inspection or subnet filtering is needed. Private Endpoint NSG and route policy support is the direct configuration or deployment choice.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative deploys a supported private endpoint NIC in the correct consumer VNet subnet, which solves a different networking task. It does not directly apply enabled private endpoint network policies when traffic inspection or subnet filtering is needed.

C:

Network-level connectivity prerequisite for remote Private Endpoints is useful when the goal is to require appropriate VPN, ExpressRoute or peering connectivity before remote networks can route to a private endpoint IP. Here, the required behavior is to apply enabled private endpoint network policies when traffic inspection or subnet filtering is needed.

D:

Although Private Endpoint approval workflow requires the service owner to authorize pending private endpoint connections when necessary, that is not sufficient to apply enabled private endpoint network policies when traffic inspection or subnet filtering is needed in this case.

Question 912

Remote access is successful for a pilot but exceeds limits when the full workforce connects. Which step best addresses this particular situation?

  1. P2S VPN client profile generation
  2. P2S gateway SKU and concurrent-user limits
  3. P2S route distribution to clients
  4. Point-to-site VPN for individual users

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The intended behavior is to size point-to-site connectivity for the expected simultaneous remote clients. P2S gateway SKU and concurrent-user limits is the direct configuration or deployment choice.

Incorrect Answers

A:

P2S VPN client profile generation is useful when the goal is to deliver the correct gateway endpoints, routes and authentication settings to client devices. Here, the required behavior is to size point-to-site connectivity for the expected simultaneous remote clients.

C:

That approach advertises or includes the correct private destination prefixes in remote-user VPN profiles; it does not replace P2S gateway SKU and concurrent-user limits for the constraint in this scenario.

D:

That approach provides encrypted client-to-VNet connectivity without establishing a site-to-site office tunnel; it does not replace P2S gateway SKU and concurrent-user limits for the constraint in this scenario.

Question 913

An address plan puts unrelated workload NICs into the firewall's dedicated subnet. Which step best addresses this particular situation?

  1. GatewaySubnet for virtual network gateway
  2. Address and subnet allocation inventory
  3. AzureFirewallSubnet sizing
  4. Dedicated AzureBastionSubnet

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

AzureFirewallSubnet sizing provides the reserved firewall subnet for the managed Azure Firewall deployment.

Incorrect Answers

A:

GatewaySubnet for virtual network gateway is useful when the goal is to allocate the reserved gateway subnet used by Azure VPN or ExpressRoute gateways. Here, the required behavior is to provide the reserved firewall subnet for the managed Azure Firewall deployment.

B:

This alternative tracks CIDR ownership, free space and subnet relationships before deployment, which solves a different networking task. It does not directly provide the reserved firewall subnet for the managed Azure Firewall deployment.

D:

That approach reserves the specifically named subnet required for Azure Bastion; it does not replace AzureFirewallSubnet sizing for the constraint in this scenario.

Question 914

An origin group has two healthy regional backends but traffic weighting is wrong. Which implementation most directly resolves this requirement?

  1. Azure Front Door global application delivery
  2. Front Door Private Link to supported origin
  3. Front Door origin group priority failover
  4. Front Door origin weighting for load distribution

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Front Door origin weighting for load distribution is appropriate because it balances requests among equally prioritized healthy origins using configured weights.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Azure Front Door global application delivery provides globally distributed edge entry points with accelerated HTTP/S routing to origins. The current problem instead requires a control that balances requests among equally prioritized healthy origins using configured weights.

B:

Front Door Private Link to supported origin connects an eligible Front Door Premium origin privately without exposing it broadly. The current problem instead requires a control that balances requests among equally prioritized healthy origins using configured weights.

C:

Although Front Door origin group priority failover selects healthy primary and secondary origins using configured priority and health, that is not sufficient to balance requests among equally prioritized healthy origins using configured weights in this case.

Question 915

A new workload subnet already has the service endpoint enabled but lacks its approved storage endpoint policy binding. What is the most appropriate next design decision?

  1. Service endpoint policy subnet binding
  2. PaaS resource firewall VNet rule
  3. Service endpoint policy for storage resource scope
  4. Private Endpoint for hybrid private-service consumers

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The relevant action is Service endpoint policy subnet binding: it associates an approved service endpoint policy with the intended endpoint-enabled workload subnet.

Incorrect Answers

B:

PaaS resource firewall VNet rule is useful when the goal is to permit the specified subnet at the target managed service after a service endpoint is enabled. Here, the required behavior is to associate an approved service endpoint policy with the intended endpoint-enabled workload subnet.

C:

This choice restricts supported endpoint traffic from a subnet to specifically allowed Azure Storage resources. It leaves the specific need to associate an approved service endpoint policy with the intended endpoint-enabled workload subnet unaddressed.

D:

This alternative uses an approved private endpoint with hybrid DNS and VPN/ExpressRoute reachability when on-premises clients require private PaaS access, which solves a different networking task. It does not directly associate an approved service endpoint policy with the intended endpoint-enabled workload subnet.

Question 916

Azure Firewall deployment fails because the subnet name is incorrect. Which approach best satisfies the access or connectivity requirement?

  1. AzureFirewallSubnet sizing
  2. Subnet delegation for PaaS integration
  3. Subnet size and reserved IP planning
  4. Address and subnet allocation inventory

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This choice provides the reserved firewall subnet for the managed Azure Firewall deployment.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Subnet delegation for PaaS integration delegates a subnet to a supported service so the platform can manage its integration requirements. The current problem instead requires a control that provides the reserved firewall subnet for the managed Azure Firewall deployment.

C:

Although Subnet size and reserved IP planning accounts for Azure-reserved addresses and workload growth in each subnet, that is not sufficient to provide the reserved firewall subnet for the managed Azure Firewall deployment in this case.

D:

This choice tracks CIDR ownership, free space and subnet relationships before deployment. It leaves the specific need to provide the reserved firewall subnet for the managed Azure Firewall deployment unaddressed.

Question 917

An auditor wants the effective set of inbound and outbound NSG rules on an interface. Which implementation most directly resolves this requirement?

  1. Network Watcher next hop
  2. Cloud Security Explorer asset queries
  3. Network Watcher effective security rules
  4. Network Watcher IP flow verify

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Network Watcher effective security rules is appropriate because it lists the combined network security rules effective on an Azure VM interface.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That approach determines a VM's effective route and next-hop category to a destination; it does not replace Network Watcher effective security rules for the constraint in this scenario.

B:

Cloud Security Explorer asset queries searches security and resource context to find network assets matching risk conditions. The current problem instead requires a control that lists the combined network security rules effective on an Azure VM interface.

D:

This alternative identifies an NSG rule that allows or denies a specified VM traffic flow, which solves a different networking task. It does not directly list the combined network security rules effective on an Azure VM interface.

Question 918

After a private DNS rollout, branch clients need to send their private-zone queries into Azure. Which Azure control would meet the operational need?

  1. DNS private endpoint record validation
  2. Azure DNS Private Resolver inbound endpoint
  3. Azure-provided DNS for VNet hostnames
  4. Azure private DNS zone

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Azure DNS Private Resolver inbound endpoint is appropriate because it accepts DNS queries arriving from on-premises or connected networks into Azure resolution.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That approach confirms private service FQDNs resolve to the intended private endpoint addresses; it does not replace Azure DNS Private Resolver inbound endpoint for the constraint in this scenario.

C:

Although Azure-provided DNS for VNet hostnames resolves supported internal hostnames using default Azure DNS within a VNet, that is not sufficient to accept DNS queries arriving from on-premises or connected networks into Azure resolution in this case.

D:

This choice stores DNS records visible through linked private-network resolution rather than public DNS. It leaves the specific need to accept DNS queries arriving from on-premises or connected networks into Azure resolution unaddressed.

Question 919

A team must distinguish a resolution-only zone link from registration-enabled linking. What should the team implement or correct?

  1. Private DNS zone auto-registration link
  2. DNS private endpoint record validation
  3. Azure private DNS zone
  4. Azure DNS public zone delegation

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Private DNS zone auto-registration link is appropriate because it registers eligible VM DNS records automatically in a linked private DNS zone.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This choice confirms private service FQDNs resolve to the intended private endpoint addresses. It leaves the specific need to register eligible VM DNS records automatically in a linked private DNS zone unaddressed.

C:

Azure private DNS zone stores DNS records visible through linked private-network resolution rather than public DNS. The current problem instead requires a control that registers eligible VM DNS records automatically in a linked private DNS zone.

D:

Although Azure DNS public zone delegation hosts authoritative public DNS records under an internet-resolvable zone, that is not sufficient to register eligible VM DNS records automatically in a linked private DNS zone in this case.

Question 920

A multi-tenant provider needs to expose its private-link service using an appropriate alias. What is the most defensible solution for this case?

  1. Private Link service provider design
  2. Network-level connectivity prerequisite for remote Private Endpoints
  3. Private Link service alias distribution
  4. Private Endpoint resource-specific authorization

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Private Link service alias distribution gives authorized consumers a service alias to request private endpoints without using the full resource ID.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That approach exposes a customer-hosted service behind a supported Azure Standard Load Balancer through Private Link; it does not replace Private Link service alias distribution for the constraint in this scenario.

B:

This alternative requires appropriate VPN, ExpressRoute or peering connectivity before remote networks can route to a private endpoint IP, which solves a different networking task. It does not directly give authorized consumers a service alias to request private endpoints without using the full resource ID.

D:

This alternative scopes a private-link connection to the intended service instance and applies provider-side approval and service access restrictions, which solves a different networking task. It does not directly give authorized consumers a service alias to request private endpoints without using the full resource ID.